euro-toolhub.eu
Video conferencing

European alternatives to Zoom

Zoom is widely used, but subject to US law. Anyone who wants to run video conferences with more data control can use European-hosted or self-hostable solutions.

Why look for an alternative?

Reasons include data sovereignty, EU hosting and the desire for an open, open-source solution without being tied to a US provider.

What to look for in an alternative

  • EU hosting or self-hosting
  • Stable quality for larger meetings
  • No account required for participants (optional)
  • DPA for hosted offerings
  • Operational effort for self-hosting

The best European alternatives at a glance

Sorted by suitability as a replacement for the tool you searched. The Sovereignty Score independently rates how European and data-sovereign a provider is – so the two values can differ.

1
78Fit
60Sovereignty

Jitsi Meet

Open, self-hostable solutionUnited States

Open-source video conferencing software that can be self-hosted – full data control with own operation.

View profile
2
80Fit
80Sovereignty

Whereby

Browser-based, EU serversNorway

Norwegian, browser-based video conferencing with EU servers – GDPR-compliant, ISO 27001, also as an embeddable video API.

View profile

Comparison table

ProvidersFitSovereigntyHeadquartersOpen SourceSelf-hostingEU hostingPricing
Jitsi Meet7860United StatesOpen source (self-hosting free)
Whereby8080NorwayFreemium / cloud subscription (per user)

The top providers in detail

Jitsi Meet is a well-known open-source solution (Apache 2.0) for video conferencing. Self-hosted on European servers, it gives you full control over the data and a free Zoom alternative. It should be noted that the project has been backed by the US company 8x8 since 2018: the public instance meet.jit.si runs on AWS and requires sign-in with Google, GitHub or Facebook for some features – for data-sensitive use, self-hosting in the EU is therefore recommended.

Strengths

  • Open source and self-hostable without license costs
  • No account required for participants
  • Full data control with own operation

Weaknesses

  • Project sponsor is a US company
  • Public instance does not offer EU data residency
  • Self-hosting requires resources for stable quality

Whereby is a browser-based video conferencing solution from Norway (EEA) that emerged from the early WebRTC service appear.in. According to the provider, meetings are hosted in Europe; European users are routed through EEA data centers, which is relevant in relation to the US CLOUD Act. Whereby is GDPR-compliant and has been ISO/IEC 27001 certified since 2022, and it can also be used as an embeddable video API (Whereby Embedded), for example in healthcare. There is a free plan as well as paid plans per user.

Strengths

  • EU/EEA servers, ISO 27001, GDPR-compliant
  • Browser-based, usable without installation
  • Embeddable video API (Whereby Embedded)

Weaknesses

  • Headquartered in Norway (EEA), not in the EU
  • Not open source, no self-hosting

Migration effort

ProvidersMigration effortFit
Jitsi Meetmedium78/100
Wherebylow80/100

When switching pays off

Anyone with IT resources can self-host Jitsi Meet on European servers and get a free, open Zoom alternative with full data control.

When to stick with your current tool

For very large, professionally moderated webinars with many additional features, a hosted specialized solution may be more sensible than pure self-hosting.

Frequently asked questions

Is Jitsi as stable as Zoom?
For smaller meetings and good hosting, yes. For very large calls, quality depends heavily on server performance – a specialized managed hoster is worthwhile here.

The Sovereignty Score is an editorial orientation aid, not legal advice. How we rate.